Before a stablecoin is issued, accepted or used to settle, five decisions shape everything after them: whether to issue or integrate, which MiCA role that gives you, how each corridor pays out at the far end, who can sign, and how the token reaches your books. We make those decisions with you, then design the system that follows from them, and write it down so your board, your auditors and your supervisor can follow it.
Banks, payment and e-money institutions, fintechs, corporate treasuries and NGOs that issue, accept, or settle in stablecoins.
A route decision, a regulatory role map, and the architecture, corridors, custody and integration that follow from them.
A milestone-based mandate from the first decision to launch, or an advisory cadence alongside your team.
Four phases, each closed by a written decision before the next one starts. Open a deliverable to see what is inside.
Your use case, markets, counterparties, existing infrastructure and the regimes that apply, written up as the options on the table.
A framing note: the options, the constraints and the questions the decision phase must answer.
The route and the regulatory role, taken to your decision-makers. Nothing is designed until the route is agreed.
Architecture, corridors, custody and treasury integration, in working sessions with your product, risk, treasury and engineering teams.
Liquidity, redemption under pressure and the questions a supervisor will ask; then vendor selection, the licence file with your counsel, and oversight through go-live.
Stress-test results, the vendor shortlist, the licence file prepared with your counsel, and oversight through go-live.
Pick the question closest to yours. You see where the mandate starts, which of the six workstreams it touches, and what you hold once the decision phase closes.
You are a bank, an e-money institution or a platform, and you need to know whether issuing is worth a licence, a reserve and a distribution effort, or whether EURC or USDC does the job.
EMT issuer, CASP, or neither. You need the answer, the supervisor and the obligations that come with it before you design anything.
Payouts, payroll or aid from Europe, received as local money in a bank account, a mobile money wallet or at a cash point.
Liquidity, redemption timing, custody approvals and reconciliation break as volumes grow. You need the operating model, not another demo.
The screen we run in a first call. It is indicative, not legal advice: the route decision memo is where the answer is tested, with your counsel.
Four routes into stablecoins, from the lightest to the heaviest.
The fastest route: you settle in EURC or USDC through a regulated partner, and the issuer carries the reserve and redemption.
You hold, exchange or transfer tokens issued by others on behalf of clients, which makes you a crypto-asset service provider.
Your brand on the token, without your own e-money licence: the licensed partner issues, holds the reserve and redeems.
Full control of the token and the reserve income, at the cost of a licence, a reserve, redemption at par and a distribution effort.
From the first decision to the bank account. Most mandates start with the first two; the others follow from what they decide. The workstreams your question touches are marked.
Four routes compared: accept existing tokens such as EURC or USDC, offer services to clients as a CASP, distribute a branded token from a licensed issuer, or issue your own EMT. Each is scored on licence, cost, time to market and control, and we recommend one.
Which MiCA role each activity gives you, EMT issuer, ART issuer or CASP, and who supervises it: the ACPR and the AMF in France, NYDFS or MAS where relevant. DORA, the Travel Rule and AML obligations are tied to a design decision and an owner, and the file is prepared with your counsel.
For issuers: reserve composition, redemption at par and its windows and cut-offs, and operational liquidity and capital buffers sized against stress scenarios, so redemptions hold under pressure.
Europe to Africa and the Middle East: the licensed off-ramp partner in each market, how its payout liquidity is prefunded, where FX conversion happens, payout to bank accounts, mobile money or cash pickup, and who owns the exception when a payout fails after the token has moved.
Custody designed as a control first: signers, approval thresholds and recovery, with MPC, HSM or multisig. Then networks, custodians, screening tools and Travel Rule providers, compared with the trade-offs written down.
Token balances and transfers brought into the systems finance already runs, with a reconciliation that matches every transfer to a ledger entry, a provider reference and a bank movement.
Won for architecting a bulk-payment system that delivers funds to refugees, collected through SMS codes and MoneyGram access.
tracee is a Certified Member of Circle's partner network for institutional builders deploying USDC and EURC payment, treasury, and settlement infrastructure.
A current mandate advising a UN multilateral climate fund on digital payment and AI infrastructure across six Central African countries.
Most firms should integrate an existing regulated token such as EURC or USDC. Issuing makes sense when you hold, or can obtain, a credit institution or e-money licence, have a network that will hold the token, and can fund the reserve and redemption operations. We compare the routes on licence, cost, time to market and control, and recommend one.
It depends on what you do with the token. Issuing an e-money token requires a credit institution or e-money institution. Holding, exchanging or transferring tokens for clients requires CASP authorisation, granted in France by the AMF with an opinion from the ACPR. Using stablecoins for your own treasury often requires neither. We map each activity to its role, its supervisor and its obligations.
Yes. We design Europe to Africa and Middle East corridors end to end: the licensed off-ramp partner in each market, prefunded payout liquidity, the FX conversion point, and payout to bank accounts, mobile money wallets such as M-Pesa, MTN MoMo or Orange Money, or cash pickup, with an owner for every exception.
No. We design custody as a control first: who signs, with how many approvals, and how a lost key is recovered. Then we compare models and providers, for example Fireblocks, Taurus, Ripple Custody or BitGo, against those requirements and write down why one fits. You make the choice.
We design the architecture and operating model the application describes, and work alongside your legal counsel, who files it. tracee is a consulting firm, not a law firm.
It depends on who you settle with, where your liquidity sits, and what your supervisor expects. We compare the options on cost, reach, custody support, and regulatory acceptance, and write down why one wins.
Most engagements combine services, because the decisions are connected. Each one runs under one of our four engagement formats.
Thirty minutes, no slide deck, no obligation. Tell us your market and your corridor, and whether you want to issue, accept, or settle, and we will tell you which route fits and whether we can help.